Cory Doctorow - A post-American, enshittification-resistant internet
https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-a-post-american-enshittification-resistant-internet
Trump has staged an unscheduled, midair rapid disassembly of the global system of trade. Ironically, it is this system that prevented all of America’s trading partners from disenshittifying their internet: the US trade representative threatened the world with tariffs unless they passed laws that criminalized reverse-engineering and modding. By banning “adversarial interoperability,” America handcuffed the world’s technologists, banning them from creating the mods, hacks, alt clients, scrapers, and other tools needed to liberate their neighbours from the enshittificatory predations of the ketamine-addled zuckermuskian tyrants of US Big Tech.
Well, when life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla. The Trump tariffs are here, and it’s time to pick the locks on the those handcuffs and set the world’s hackers loose on Big Tech. Happy Liberation Day, everyone!
Enshittification wasn’t an accident. It also wasn’t inevitable. This isn’t the iron laws of economics at work, nor is it the great forces of history.
Enshittification was a choice: named individuals, in living memory, enacted policies that created the enshittogenic environment. They created a world that encouraged tech companies to merge to monopoly, transforming the internet into “five giant websites, each filled with screenshots of the other four.” They let these monopolists rip us off and spy on us.
And they banned us from fighting back, claiming that anyone who modified a technology without permission from its maker was a pirate (or worse, a terrorist). They created a system of “felony contempt of business-model,” where it’s literally a crime to change how your own devices work. They declared war on the general-purpose computer and demanded a computer that would do what the manufacturer told it to do (even if the owner of the computer didn’t want that).
We are at a turning point in the decades-long war on general-purpose computing. Geopolitics are up for grabs. The future is ours to seize.
In my 24 years with EFF, I have seen many strange moments, but never one quite like this. There’s plenty of terrifying things going on right now, but there’s also a massive, amazing, incredibly opportunity to seize the means of computation.
Let’s take it. '
Licensed to the public under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
4 Comments
Comments from other communities
This seems to be the crux of his argument in his latest book, enshittification. It takes a step beyond his common complaint (DMCA) and suggests other countries ignore their version of it to circumvent US Big Tech laws. I’m all for it, but it requires European governments to understand the situation and act. We’ll see.
It seems like they’ll do the exact opposite. The EU is preparing a change to the GDPR to exclude A.I. purposes and the commission has agreed to adopt American car safety standards (which are way lower) during the tariff negotiations.
If only our politicians had more than 3 neurons and could focus them on the common good instead of their own greed
Loved the talk. Absolute must watch
Cory even revoked my book’s return policy:

Why’d the author strike his own name?
I was wondering that myself when I saw it
Seems like it’s a thing some authors do, often for various reasons
https://www.writersdigest.com/writing-articles/authors-cross-name-signing-book
Thanks for this!
I particularly liked this author’s response:
Nicholas Belardes
“Sometimes I cross my name out and sign. I do it out of respect for myself, for the idea of accomplishment, for the idea that writers are real people, that we can touch our manuscripts in ways that transcend the printed objects they’ve become. Our works become even more personal this way, because our signatures are more physically attributed to us in the world than even fingerprints.”
As soon as I read his trademark word I knew it was Doctorow, awesome! I’ll give this a full listen sometime later.
To stop enshittification, we all need to chase away any attempt to capitalize on the internet and get back to the roots of preventing data scarcity. Anyone running an ad or promoting some product should be chased out. Their product stolen and copied and shared until these people know they’re not welcome. It would have prevented all of the enshittification had pewdiepies and Joe Rogans and Mr beasts were treated as the time vampires they are. It’s not just simple advertising that we could turn off. It turned into a massive machine that stole our data, built profiles, created digital addiction tools and tracked all our movements just to sell us things.
I thought that I’d listen to 30 seconds and scroll, but I’m really glad I didn’t. Really solid argument, but it’s got a “last mile” problem, and that’s gotta be on us to figure out I think.
The question at the end where he basically ignored and didn’t answer was “so how do we do this?”. THAT is the question. I’d love to hear that answer.
Step 1 - raise awareness.
Step 2 - gather active participants
Step 3 - collectively do legal things that make life harder for anyone with the power to enact this, yet does not.
Step 4 - repeat Step 3, making it clear why this is happening.
Step 5 - make memes of the affair to further drive engagement.
Step 5.1 (potentially American/Russian/etc Exclusive) - get declared a terrorist for doing perfectly legal things
Step 6 - keep going anyway, in spite of what consequences can be brought.
Step 7 - profit build incremental victories to bolster the movement.
I wish there was a text transcript of this, I will check the video out after the holidays though.
TLDR: US forced everyone to pass anti-circumvention laws by threatening tariffs. Now that the US has unilaterally imposed tariffs on everyone, why not repeal those laws?
Also it doesn’t really matter how big your economy is, it’s like a first mover incentive. So small countries who were relying on aid via USAID and various other soft power schemes that DOGE cut have a huge incentive now to be the first to create the tools and markets.
This really needs to get widely seen. It is indeed hopeful, in a good way.
It’s pretty wild, because this is genuinely great politics and great policy. It’s weird that folks haven’t realized this and acted on it yet. Fingers crossed.
to summarize:
- activists don’t like the US’ dominance in tech clouds and services, obviously
- reducing the effect of US tech in europe would mean that smaller european companies have a chance at competing as well
- national security hawks don’t like having essential services depend on the US either
in the past, the US forced everyone to comply with US tech because the US was economically too powerful to deny requests to, but now that is changing because US economy is not so important internationally anymore, due to tariffs but also because US consumers are becoming poorer and therefore less important as a consumer market.
Deleted by author
Yeah, it’s kinda like how you can go years without hearing any stories about someone winning a medal at the Olympics then suddenly the news is full of stories about people winning Olympic medals. Clearly it’s a conspiracy.
CCC just wrapped up two days ago. https://events.ccc.de/congress/2025/infos/startpage.html
This happens every year with CCC, Defcon, and Blackhat. There are always interesting talks and you get a slew of posts from interested people.
It’s a major hacker community centric event. The biggest in Europe. It could be that the community just likes it. 🤷♀️
The chaos communication congress is a non commercial volunteer run event. They don’t need marketing, because they sell out quickly.
Doctorow wrote a blog post about this. It has the video and a transcription of it, so you can either watch it, read it or both.
https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition
He also has a book on this topic, called Enshittification (I haven’t read it, yet). I believe this talk was part of his book tour for the book. You can buy it DRM-free from his webpage: https://craphound.com/shop/
Hosted on YouTube.
Originally/additionally hosted on media.ccc.de
Is ccc.de down or something? I think reuploading video about enshittification to YouTube and posting it to a privacy-focused channel is exactly why we have a risk of losing privacy game.
You do have a point. TBH I only now realized that the video was posted from Doctorow’s personal account, and without a link to the “original”, which yeah, kinda weird.
The talk itself is still worth it (had the fortune of sitting in the audience), but probably a good idea to use the media.ccc.de link.
Sorry, that was the only place I knew it existed at the time. The YT algorithm suggested it to me. I did remove the stupid tracking ID from it though.
Would it be bad taste to swap out the link with the one on ccc.de?
ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
Jemmy
Share on Mastodon
northernlights
If you haven’t read Enshittification yet, do yourself a favour and get a copy. It’s a wonderful read.
agreed - I second this
It feels like a full summation of every work he’s ever written on Enshittification on his Pluralistic blog, being someone who’s read it for a long while now. I definitely didn’t get much new information from the book on top of what he’s written about in his blog before, but it’s still a very good read, and much more concise than hundreds of separate blog posts that sometimes repeat the same talking points from older ones.
A great read if you want to just sit down and learn practically everything about Enshittification, from what it is at its core to things like specific historical examples, primarily of tech leaders at major tech companies enshittifying their products. Some of that stuff is batshit crazy.
just finished it, it’s a great talk. i hope he’s right and the countries finally start fighting back!