JemmyThere's Light at The End of The Tunnel (a new form of UV light... could change public health forever)
submitted a month ago by Brkdncr edited a month ago
www.okdoomer.io/theres-light-at-the-end-of-the-…
submitted a month ago by Brkdncr edited a month ago
www.okdoomer.io/theres-light-at-the-end-of-the-…
Or maybe, before the creation of UV LEDs in the last decade, it took huge mercury vapor lamps that took a fuckton of power and put out dangerous UV radiation as well as a bunch of heat?
Nah, obviously it's a conspiracy.
This article reads like it has an agenda.
Yeah it reads like an article about using phages for therapy. All the positives, some of them unproven, no concerns, at the end something for the anti-antibiotics moms to recite.
Yeah, this was funnier when trump said it.
All media has an agenda.
TFA cites papers, published in Nature no less; clearly it isn’t hogwash. Doesn’t mean that it’s as amazing as the article claimed, but to dismiss it as “having an agenda” is quite something.
The article feels like it does have an agenda. The tech itself may be solid, but the way they phrase certain things makes it seem like this is some sort of “but big Pharma would kill it“ conspiracy article. Personally, I’ve wondered why we’re not doing more with UV pre/during/post-pandemic, although I’ve never heard of “far-UV”,
But an interesting read nonetheless
If we're still learning about best practices why are we talking about deploying this at scale? Self contradictory article.....
It should be the other way around. Figure out if it works academically, then test small scale, then scale up with proven and reproducible results. That's how science works. Best practices can be formulated and adjusted at each stage as more knowledge is gained. That's how we don't make a massive health mistake and give an entire convention center indoor sunburns. Especially for people who might be more sensitive to sunburns.
Thx for this post, but can you change the title to a more explicit one?
Good idea