Ad industry initiative abruptly shuts down after lawsuit filed by Elon Musk’s X

submitted a month ago by some_guy

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/ad-industry…

315

Log in to comment

53 Comments

themurphy a month ago

He literally bullied a non-profit organisation set in the world to use advertisement money responsible into ceasing operations.

Loss for the world once again, and the article even says that Republicans celebrated. That country is sick.

norimee a month ago, edited a month ago

THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING.
He didn't shut down advertisers, he shut down an organisation for best practices in advertising.

Wiki World Federation of Advertisers

WFA's aim is to champion effective and sustainable marketing communications worldwide. ..

...WFA formed the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a global cross-industry alliance which aims to improve digital safety and eliminate harmful online content....The alliance has introduced guidelines concerning misinformation and new standards on ad placements...

...WFA is a founding member of the Unstereotype Alliance, UN Women's flagship partnership with the marketing industry to eradicate harmful gender stereotypes in advertising...It is also a founding member of the Coalition for Better Ads, a cross-industry initiative to improve consumers’ experience with online advertising.

WFA holds Global Marketer Week, a series of events bringing together brand marketers to learn about the latest public affairs issues and best practice in marketing.

schema a month ago

Even if this group shuts down completely, all this does is waste twitter's money while it also tells advertisers to stay the fuck away from ever do any business on Twitter.

SlopppyEngineer a month ago

And now he has to sue the advertisers individually if he wants to continue this idiotic plan. That'll surely convince people to spend money on X

Vanon a month ago

I read this similarly. Most significantly, advertisers in the group are probably less likely to spend on tweeter now. The complete opposite of Elen's goal. The advertisers simply "deleted" the group (not any actual ad agencies), because it was calculated to cost the least. The group, GARM, was an attempt to collectively manage harm to their brands, which they will obviously continue to do in other ways.

db2 a month ago

The frivolous lawsuit worked then.

UnderpantsWeevil a month ago

More economically to shut down and reincorporate than to spend a bunch of money on lawyers.

But I doubt Musk is going to see a flood of new ad revenue out of this.

shalafi a month ago

new ad revenue

I'm no marketing guy, and all other things aside, signing an advertising agreement with X would be a hard "NO" after this suit.

Imgonnatrythis a month ago

Maybe it's a Win win. Less advertisers and Elon looks like a psychopath and disuades further ad income for his hate platform

EatMyPixelDust a month ago

I feel like this will only hurt him in the long term, advertisers in general are probably more likely to avoid X in the future. I know I would.

BleatingZombie a month ago

"Hey, come over here. And when you do, I won't let you leave"

katy ✨ a month ago

jk rowling, elon musk.. what is it with billionaires suing people to silence criticism

ShaggySnacks a month ago

They are all the biggest snowflakes. The slightest criticism breaks their fragile egos. Billionaires really require a safe space.

technocrit a month ago

TBH the whole planet is a safe space for billionaires, not so much for everybody else.

Gsus4 a month ago

It's cheap to them and bankrupts their victims or forces them to settle. There should be a way to punish frivolous lawsuits by %income/assets.

ReallyActuallyFrankenstein a month ago, edited a month ago

Today, the House Judiciary GOP's official account on X called GARM being discontinued a "big win for the First Amendment" and a "big win for oversight." X CEO Linda Yaccarino also applauded the news.

It's just opposite day? We just say whatever is the opposite of what's true?

UnderpantsWeevil a month ago

Beating my enemies into submission = A big win for Freedom and Liberty

The first amendment is simply when conservatives get what they want.

Snapz a month ago

We really don't say it enough, but fuck Linda for being a hollow, complicit piece of shit human.

some_guy [OP] a month ago

Right wingers live in the UpsideDown.

The Assman a month ago

I wish

Billiam a month ago

You know the "O" in "GOP" stands for "opposition" right?

Asafum a month ago

I'm partial to Gaslight Obstruct Project. This is probably somewhere in "gaslight" as in "this is a good thing! You must be crazy to think this is bad, everyone says this is a good thing."

Zak a month ago

Musk: *starts allowing Nazi shit on Xitter*

Advertiisers: Hey, we don't like Nazi shit. We might stop advertising if that keeps happening.

Musk: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

Advertisers: *stop doing business with the guy who told them to go fuck themselves*

goferking0 a month ago

*Elon then sues them for listening to his advice*

felixwhynot a month ago

EM: oh no

TheDarksteel94 a month ago

Who could've ever seen this coming? lol

Red_October a month ago

Sounds to me like all advertisers should just assume that on Xitter, their ads will show alongside Nazi/Alt-Right/Hateful content. GARM, the project that Elmo just killed, used to inform them when that sort of thing happened. So with the warning system down, Ad companies should revert to a fail-safe state and abandon the platform completely.

And the rest of us should *ABSOLUTELY* make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

Revan343 a month ago

And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

This is the way

axh a month ago

And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots

Good idea, but stopping using xitter completely would be even better.

acargitz a month ago

That's a SLAPP suit.

Thebular a month ago

It definitely is, but they filed in Texas which doesn't have anti-SLAPP laws for federal cases

harrys_balzac a month ago

Do what other businesses do - just reincorporate under a different name

DrunkenPirate a month ago

Note to myself: Whenever I do contracts or somehow being responsible, I‘ll put a proxy company in between. If things go bad, I just shut down that responsible proxy and am out of duty.

Just an interesting observation about business behavior.

[deleted] a month ago

How it would work in real life?

Like how can you advertise on Xitter via a proxy?

Simulation6 a month ago

They are getting all this great free press about why to avoid Musk, must have figured their job is done.

YeetPics a month ago

I wish Elon treated the whole planet like his children.

He would just jet off and never communicate again, we would be free of this cancer for good.

HubertManne a month ago

I heard the new club is going to be called thenoelons and Elon Lindenstrauss is going to be a member.

__Lost__ a month ago

It says "no ElonS" We're allowed to have one

afivedaystorm a month ago

Why can’t he shut down already?

Passerby6497 a month ago

Cowards

AlteredEgo a month ago

On the one hand I hate Elon Musk. On the other hand I also hate advertisement.

So.... win / win?

YeetPics a month ago

Idk, advertisers didn't get shut down, a *group promoting best practices in advertising* got shut down.

You're about to dislike ads even more.

gearheart a month ago

Lose/lose situation here unfortunately.

Basically he threw a fit. It worked.

It affected something that it should not have.

Banned

Hey

You aren't advertising with me. Stop bullying me and give me money.

If you don't give me money right now, you're bullying me.

Banned

What did he win? They aren't going to resume advertising with him. They got out of the lawsuit without having to pay lawyers or change their behavior. What did he win?

Socialist Berserker a month ago, edited a month ago

Banned

androogee (they/she) a month ago, edited a month ago

If a stupid person being impressed by himself counted as "winning," there'd be a whole lot more winners out there.

But it doesn't.

friendlymessage a month ago

I mean, I like Elon

Honest question, why?

FiskFisk33 a month ago

how do you mean? they just "hydra'd" on him. If he wants to sue them now for leaving xitter he will have to go after them individually.

lazynooblet a month ago

I don't get it. Elon didn't win a thing, he lost harder.

He complained advertisers were banding together and boycotting his platform. He starts a frivolous lawsuit.

So now even more advertisers are boycotting his platform.

katy ✨ a month ago

you hate people bullying people yet you love elon bullying a non profit into silence?

also this isn't going to bring advertisers to twitter.

Spotlight7573 a month ago

A multi-billion dollar social media company sued an ad industry group that was trying to have help companies have some kind of brand safety standards to prevent a company's ads from appearing next to objectionable content. They reportedly had two full-time staff members. This isn't some big win, it's bullying itself.