Wait, but if you’re quoting them acknowledging it….
….then you claim they were saying “there weren’t horrors”…. isn’t that a bit like trying to have your cake and eat it too? They were either denying it, or actively discussing it - and it doesn’t look like they were denying it (just discussing the causes in a way you don’t like).
Wait, but if you’re quoting them acknowledging it….
In the same dubious way that ‘acknowledging’ there was ‘unrest’ at Tiananmen Square whilst blaming the protesters is acknowledging the Tiananmen Square massacre, fucking sure.
They were either denying it, or actively discussing it - and it doesn’t look like they were denying it
“It happened but it was just a little mistake by one man, no one involved really wanted it and they all tried to stop it!”
If someone said that about the Holocaust, would that be:
A. Denialism
OR
B. Not denialism?
Fucking forget it. One post here, and one test post on ML three months ago?
Jemmy
PugJesus
Share on Mastodon
Share on Reddit
Share on WhatsApp
Wait, but if you’re quoting them acknowledging it….
….then you claim they were saying “there weren’t horrors”…. isn’t that a bit like trying to have your cake and eat it too? They were either denying it, or actively discussing it - and it doesn’t look like they were denying it (just discussing the causes in a way you don’t like).
Are you a Tankie?
In the same dubious way that ‘acknowledging’ there was ‘unrest’ at Tiananmen Square whilst blaming the protesters is acknowledging the Tiananmen Square massacre, fucking sure.
“It happened but it was just a little mistake by one man, no one involved really wanted it and they all tried to stop it!”
If someone said that about the Holocaust, would that be:
A. Denialism
OR
B. Not denialism?
Fucking forget it. One post here, and one test post on ML three months ago?